Adidas Crazy Explosive Primeknit Review: A Breakdown of 2017’s King

Let’s wind the clocks back 3 years – the year where we saw Adidas on an unbelievable roll, putting out fire after fire shoes for us to play, and for a surprisingly kick-ass price. This is why today I’m bringing you my Adidas Crazy Explosive Primeknit review.

I think a lot of us, myself included, particularly remember this one as being arguably the best hoop sneaker in the last few years.

THE CRAZY EXPLOSIVE PRIMEKNIT 2017 IS SOMETHING ELSE…

I’ve brought out this beast which I bought three years ago and actually kept playing ever since, despite constantly keeping up with the new releases.

The CE 2017 PK is just something that I never let go of, which is why I’d like to put you guys on the map and break it down, in case someone has missed the opportunity to check these out.

Since they’re still available on several places to get, there’s no reason why you shouldn’t – 2017 or not, the review will speak the rest.

Let’s go!

SPEC SHEET

Model: Adidas Crazy Explosive 2017 Primeknit

Build: Mid-Top (w/ high ankle sleeve)

Weight: 15.4 oz / 437 g. (size 10 US)

Retail Price: $150

Cushion: Full-length Boost

I. COMFORT & FIT

Even though the shoe is a fantastic option due to it being solid in all aspects, the fit and the comfort experience is one of the highlights. Adidas is known for their weird and inconsistent sizing throughout their releases, that stuff still happens to this day.

Not the case for 2017’s Crazy Explosive PK though – the fit is god-like, exactly as I remember during my first shootarounds. These should fit your regular true size, even for wide footers. I’m a wide footer myself and went true to size – no problems pretty much from day one.

The soft Primeknit upper, sock-like ankle collar that actually enhances the experience without being a gimmick, plus the super accurate and pleasant internal padding truly makes wearing these a joy. Virtually zero break-in time, very high breathability, and the sheer light feeling you get while moving in these are special.

They rarely make ’em like that today (I know, there are great releases still, I just miss Yeezy 350   uppers), and putting these on speaks for itself.

You can be rest assured about the comfort and fit accuracy on these – the shoe got you covered here.

II. TRACTION

The traction on these is fantastic and consistent – that would pretty much tell you most of what you need to know about it.

The outsole can seem fishy and unreliable while taking a look if you’ve seen plenty of rubber and patterns used on shoes, but the shoe grips the floor great, indoors, or outdoors.

Dust definitely is a factor though – the pattern is spaced out enough to where dust quickly makes an entrance, however, it is also spaced enough to where a quick wipe or two once in a while takes care of the issue, and you’re good to go.

Not that I slipped many times – in fact, I don’t remember any major slip that would be caused by the shoe’s bite.

They’re not the most durable shoe in the world for hooping outdoors, but I have two pairs for 3 years and the traction still holds up outside. It’s probably not at a hundred percent but it’s enough to where I still feel fully confident at all times.

It will also depend on the court – I tend to play on softer synthetic rubber court outside, which likely had to do with the rubber holding up for that long. It will last you shorter on concrete but I wouldn’t be afraid to regularly take these to the park.

III. CUSHION

This is the time where Boost was at its finest on Adidas’s basketball shoes. Full-length Boost was used on the Crazy Explosive 2017 PK and it’s still one of the most efficient and versatile setups to this day.

It’s not the softest or bounciest Boost ever but this is for a reason – the Boost foam is caged in a TPU carrier which makes it conform to a certain point where it’s extremely stable, responsive, quick, and still a lot of fun to play in (you can totally feel the bounce).

You can straight away tell that it’s a quality setup that is safe to play in for pretty much all players and playstyles. I don’t see a reason why a quick guard won’t like these or an explosive guard, or a center, or a shooter…

You get the idea.

It’s as versatile as it can get, giving you the best of all worlds, which is all a basketball player needs.

By the way, if you’re wondering, despite me playing in them for three years, with breaks here and there, Boost never blew out or deteriorated. The experience is still great.

I’m not sure if I’m lucky, as some people have reported this issue is apparent, for some as quickly as a few months after purchasing. I would say that the majority don’t have this issue so it’s a good chance you’ll be fine.

IV. SUPPORT

The awesome thing about the CE 2017 PK is it’s extremely versatile and no aspect is lacking. The same is for the shoe’s support.

You could think a soft sock-like upper like this would do a poor job holding your foot in place but thanks to Adidas’s smart implementations to boost the support and lockdown utilizing smart construction makes it all work nicely together.

Your foot sits deeper into the carrier than lots of shoe’s standard, the base of the whole shoe is wide and stable, plus it’s got a torsional shank implemented for torsional structure and proper use of Boost.

And that’s still not it – the TPU cage that holds Boost together also adds to the shoe’s lateral rigidity and support. Yeah, it limits the foam’s capabilities but still makes it an enjoyable experience while playing safely.

The package is a nice blend of everything that works well with one another – awesome!

V. BUILD & MATERIALS

The upper is Adidas’s Primeknit material in all its glory. It’s just a very soft and premium knit material with synthetic reinforcements in certain areas to add structure and improve durability.

It feels great. Just straight-up a basic concept done right and feels premium. I don’t see a reason to complain – sure, this isn’t as durable as the regular mesh version of the shoe or most shoes with more rigid uppers like leather but for a sock, basically – it’s as good as it is.

Three years of play and the upper is still very much intact, with a few chippings and marks here and there. I say that’s more than enough from a knit.

One thing that would be a nitpick but still something I should mention, my laces loosen up pretty quickly despite tightening them up real tight. This was especially apparent for the shoe’s low top version for some reason.

It’s not much of a performance or durability issue but something that’s a bit annoying as you have to constantly stop your tracks and tighten ’em up.

VI. OVERALL

As you can see, I barely have to say anything bad about the CE 2017 PK – in 2022, it’s still among my favorite performance basketball shoes ever.

Everything about it works, there are no gimmicks or fancy tech names to blow something out of proportion. It’s durable for a knit, it’s mad comfortable, feels mobile, and secure to play in, and classic Boost can never feel bad.

Anyone who’s in need of another pair of hoop shoes, no need to worry about it being old – check ’em out and you’ll see that the latest are not always the greatest! It’s a steal at Amazon after a few years, as you can grab them well under retail.

NOTE ON THE DIFFERENT VERSIONS

There are actually four versions of the shoe: there’s the regular CE 2017, the CE 2017 Low, the CE 2017 Primeknit, and the CE 2017 Low Primeknit.

My personal favorite is the mid-top Primeknit. The regular mesh upper versions are great as well but I do prefer the softer and more premium feeling PK upper any day of the week.

You can click the link below to Amazon, and see which versions are available there at the moment!

adidas D Rose 11 Review: Testing the Wide Footer’s DREAM

You already know it’s a good fit for wide footers from the title. But is it a good all-around performer on the basketball court? Here’s a detailed, outdoor-based D Rose 11 review for you – the latest signature model from Chicago’s own Derrick Rose.

But this one’s interesting. After a few subpar models, the 11th sneaker looks very reminiscent of the older shoes and it also got a considerable price drop. Smells fishy?

Let’s find out in the most comprehensive way possible. The only way.

I. SPEC SHEET

click for a full-sized sheet

I. 1-MIN REVIEW 

For those in a hurry: the adidas D Rose 11 stepped up from the last few models, making some changes to break up the rather stale Rose line.

The shoe is surely a wide footer’s attraction as it has a wide toebox. EVERYONE, including those with wide feet, will most likely be okay by stepping a 1/2 size down.

Traction was fantastic, nothing more, nothing less. Lightstrike cushion is not the Boost goodness we had on the 6th & 7th models but it’s a decent setup that provides a little bit of everything without slowing you down or making you feel like you’re running barefoot.

Support and stability were excellent just like most adidas shoes but the large heel piece did feel  clunky at times. You’re going to like this one if you like those hard, flappy step strides.

The Rose 11 has a basic screen mesh upper with a textile layered underneath and I can’t complain too much for $120. It’s not leather or anything that feels pricier but it worked and didn’t break down on me 4 months in.

For alternatives, the Baskerball Shoes is still king IMO. If you can still find it these days and you’re a Rose fan, there’s no reason for me not to recommend it even in 2021.

For more current releases that you can get easier, the Dame 7 is a superb all-around option and the D.O.N. Issue #3 is the best budget option from adidas.

III. FIT & COMFORT

TTS or should you deviate from your size? How comfy are they on-court? Anything else to know?

SIZING GUIDE

As you already know – this one’s a wide footer’s gem but not without its issues.

The moment I stepped into the D Rose 11, I was reminded of two things: one, the D Rose 10 as it fits very similarly to that shoe, and two, adidas’s usual length shenanigans.

Yes, folks, the D Rose 11 fits a bit lengthy just like we’re all accustomed to now from adidas’s footwear. Wide footer, narrow footer, or anyone in between, expect a bit of extra room for your toes if you go true to size.

However, I would NOT recommend most people to go true to size.

A half size down from your usual number, including wide footers, will be the best bet as the shoe fits all kinds of large and clunky. I’ve got thick and wide feet myself, and even stepping a 1/2 size down didn’t fully fix the fit. There’s a little bit of heel slippage at times, especially if I decide not to re-lace the shoe when the laces loosen up.

There’s still a tiny bit of room length-wise (nothing crazy though) and the shoe just has that “large” feel to it. If you’ve played in a recent Rose shoe before, you know what I mean.

For those that didn’t – expect a roomier fit overall but not one that compromises security/containment as you might think.

This is simply how D Rose likes his shoes and my guess is an obvious one – the dude’s a wide footer.

So for those with compact, narrow feet – this might not be the best option but you can pull it off. I just wouldn’t recommend the D Rose 11 for those people if looking for a perfect-fitting pair. Wide footers – this is your jam.

COMFORT

Aside from the sizing intimacies, the Rose 11 isn’t a terrible shoe to wear comfort-wise.

Just like a lot of kicks from the Three Stripes, this one feels a little bottom-heavy, a bit clunky at times but not bad at all when I’m actually playing. All those little hiccups are minimal and I don’t really think about them when it’s game time.

The D Rose 11 does feel a bit lighter than the 10th model and I never felt super duper heavy-footed, so no issues there. Not a lot of internal padding but the lining and material around the ankle still feels nice and comfy.

While there’s a bit of foam backing around the ankle area and on the tongue, the lack of proper heel notches (you know, those little pillows that stick out and cup your heel) probably has to do with the occasional heel slippage.

But once again, nothing crazy.

Overall, a decent-fitting shoe that probably won’t make anyone’s comfort or best-fitting list but one that’s totally doable and playable once you lace ’em up and get used to the shoe.

The D Rose 6 (especially the Primeknit version) is still the king in this category though, in my opinion.

IV. TRACTION

How’s the grip on various surfaces & conditions? Is dust/debris a factor? How long will the outsoles last?

 

OUTDOOR PERFORMANCE

An outsole straight from the D Rose 7. Almost. But just so you know – that’s a very, very good thing. An aggressive traction pattern that bites the concrete like crazy, in whichever direction you throw yourself to.

This pattern just doesn’t care.

While the knobs are fairly dense, I rarely have dust sensitivity issues with adidas shoes, and the 11th Rose is no exception. If you’re not a big outsole wiper – you won’t have to develop the habit for this one. Yes, even outdoors.

For me, a quick wipe or two is all I need if I’m hooping on an older concrete surface, which I do occasionally when the synthetic rubber court I usually play on is wet from rain or I’m not able to go there.

So, deadly stops, snappy pops from a screen, lateral strides, you name it. This one’s got it.

I still don’t have the ability to test them indoors since the gyms are still closed in my area but the D Rose 7 performs just as well inside, so chances are the D Rose 11 is just as good.

Even almost as good means they’d be just fine.

OUTDOOR DURABILITY

While the pattern looks identical to the D Rose 7, I’m not sure if the actual rubber used is the same. The knobs feel a bit softer to the touch in comparison but this is still a solid outdoor option, even for regular play in the park.

Adidas tends to kill it with their rubber compounds, so most of their stuff is viable to play outdoors and will last for a long time.

I’m around 4 months in with these and all I’m doing is balling outside – they still grip just fine. The ball-of-the-foot area & the areas along the sides laterally are slightly burnt off but just like the Dame line, that barely affects the actual performance since the rubber can still catch your shiftiness just fine. Bravo!

V. CUSHION

How’s the impact absorption and bounce underfoot? What about the comfort, stability, and step strides of the midsole?

 

Full-length Lighstrike is a first for the D Rose line and I kinda like it. No, this is not the god-like Boost we’ve got on the D Rose 6 & 7 but I do think it’s a slight upgrade in performance from everything we got since the 7.

The heel is huge as you can see, and the looks don’t fool this time – there’s a TON of impact protection at the back. Great compression, each heel strike or step from the heel (which is something you shouldn’t do often but still) feels awesome. In an ideal world, I would’ve liked the heel to feel a bit “faster” but it’s not a big deal at all.

The rest of the midsole isn’t the same cloud-like awesomeness as the forefoot portion is caged, so Lightrike feels much more subdued there. Firm, low to the ground, and responsive. Exactly how a guard likes it.

This heavy contrast between the heel and forefoot feels super similar to the Dame 7, so if you’ve played in that shoe – expect a similar ride.

I do feel there’s a tad bit more feedback at the front when stacked against the Dame 7 though, albeit it’s definitely nothing crazy.

Takes a bit to get used to as the step motions initially feel a bit clunky. Don’t worry though. This normalizes and ends up feeling fine if you’re not thinking about it.

Speaking of step motions – the platform of the D Rose 11 is really damn flat.

No real offset between the heel and toe, no curvature at the front or back. Adidas is notorious for this, love it or hate it. It’s a dealbreaker for some, while for me it’s merely something to get used to. Which is exactly what I did and ended up feeling solid.

Still though, if you’re looking for those buttery smooth, lebron 19 -like heel-to-toe strides, you might be disappointed. Stability is top-notch here, sure, but lots of basketball shoes nowadays look and feel almost like runners.

The D Rose 11 brings us back to the older days – you can definitely tell this one’s a hoop shoe.

VI. SUPPORT

How’s the all-around security at the cost of mobility? What about lateral stability and foot containment?

 

All-around security is great in the D Rose 11.

Once again, if you’re used to adidas’s kicks – this shouldn’t come as a surprise. We’ve got an internal heel counter for heel & ankle lockdown, as well as an external heel piece that extends all the way up to the front, acting as a cage for your feet.

A callback to the old StableFrame days? Could be.

The platform of the shoe is very wide & flat, so stability is definitely on point. The midsole extends to the sides A LOT, acting as an outrigger for further stability. You’d have to land really awkwardly to roll an ankle in this one.

Torsional support is great as well, as the midsole is rigid enough to not cause any issues. A solid choice for a flat footer too. The lacing system is traditional but, once again, reminds us of the stuff adidas just refuses to look into and fix.

I’m talking about the constantly undoing laces. I think these laces are almost identical to the Dame 7 and they feel the same too.

I lace up the shoe, the laces immediately loosen up to a point, and then slowly go into loosy-goosy territory, causing me to stop and redo them on a regular basis.

Not completely deal-breaking but annoying nonetheless. I don’t understand how stuff like this makes it through the wear-testing phases. But besides the crappy laces/lacing system – support is great on the Rose 11.

Not going to overly complain here.

VII. THE BUILD

What are the materials used on the upper and how do they perform in action? How’s the build quality & durability so far?

 

BUILD OVERVIEW

The upper doesn’t really scream “signature” but that’s probably where the $20 price drop is reflected the most.

Most of the build is utilizing screen mesh that looks to be layered with a textile underneath. The toe area looks to be made of woven/fabric material and feels pretty good. The ankle collar uses a soft textile material.

PERFORMANCE & RELIABILITY

This combo is far from premium but there’s no denying it gets the job done in giving you comfort, mobility, ventilation, and proper structure.

Yes, these should last a while even on the blacktop. And not to mention this upper barely requires any time to break in, even for a wide footer.

A couple of days were all I needed to feel the way these were intended to feel. The fit is not perfect as I’ve mentioned earlier but the materials aren’t at fault here.

Foot containment is fine as well, though the midfoot area did feel a bit flimsy at times. The roomier fit has to do with this sensation and I never slid out of the footbed so it’s not terrible.

Layered or not, this material being so thin means a 7-foot tank might feel iffy while cutting to the basket.

But then again, if you’re a 7-footer, you probably won’t be doing a lot of those. I personally didn’t feel the containment to be lacking, just felt a bit weird at times.

Thanks to that TPU cage, I was always able to stay confident and play the way I play, even if the build feels a little wonky sometimes.

Jordans 2022 products go on sale & on outlets fairly quickly, so you’ll surely be able to pick these up for under $120. But even at full retail, I don’t think it’s a bad deal. You’re getting Lightstrike, adidas’s flagship foam compound, and a solid all-around performer.

The material choices aren’t the luxury type but we’re pretty much used to this formula now. It’s all about staying light and comfy now, while a “premium” touch comes second.

The nature of today’s market – nothing we can do about it.

And adidas likely having a tighter budget to make these since we all know Rose’s “net value” has dropped over the years. The mainstream consumer just doesn’t care about the D-Rose line that much anymore.

Whatever it is – I don’t care. All I know is that it’s a decent deal.

VIII. OVERALL

Summarizing the D Rose 11 review: are they well-rounded? Is it a good buy amongst the competitors in this price range?

image source: adidas.com

The adidas D Rose 11 isn’t the spectacular release the D Rose 6 or 7 were a few years back but that doesn’t mean it’s a bad shoe. It’s a shoe not for everyone and you do have to be in line with Rose’s preferences here, like the entirely flat platform, for example.

QUICK RECAP

The shoe fits a bit long and EVERYONE should go half a size down for this one. Traction is deadly and easily among the strongest components of the shoe. Durability for outdoors is fine too. Lightstrike feels dynamic – lots of compression at the heel and responsive at the front.

Solid all-around support, unmatched stability but can feel a bit wonky, especially for a heavier, more explosive dude. The material choices aren’t premium but work just fine performance-wise. And this package for $120 – not bad.

The heel can be clunky as it’s a huge piece that could’ve been cut down in my opinion but that never caused me to want to throw these away.

Did the D Rose line return to its prime form? That would be a stretch. But there’s no denying it’s a good shoe, especially for boat-footers like myself.

IX. ALTERNATIVE SHOES

If you’re not sure whether to get the Rose 11 for one reason or another – take a look at your alternatives that might work even better

ADIDAS DAME 7, $100

If you want something similar-feeling to the Rose 11 but perhaps with a few tweaks for a faster, more mobile-feeling experience? I think the Dame 7 will definitely do the trick.

It’s still among my favorite adidas hoop shoes to play in, mainly due to how natural, yet sturdy the shoe feels on-foot and that cushy Lighstrike midsole. It definitely offers more pop than the D Rose 11 does.

ADIDAS D.O.N. ISSUE #3, $100

Yes, I think Donovan Michell’s D.O.N. Issue line is still the most attractive choice if you’re hooping on a budget and you’re an adidas fan.

The Issue #3 didn’t make a whole lot of changes from the last two models but it doesn’t have to. The shoe won’t exactly blow you away by its tech or feel but it will surely handle your basic basketball needs, such as comfort, stability, security, and feeling quick on your toes.

Speedland SL:PDX Performance Review

Right from the start, I’ll tell you the Speedland SL:PDX is a high end trail running tool that’s not for everyone. The SL:PDX is high end because of the materials, components and price. It’s more a tool than shoe because of its impressive versatility. I’m not going to talk much about the $375 price tag because it automatically self selects who’s interested. If you’re not willing to pay that price, you don’t need what the SL:PDX offers. I’m also not going to compare it with other trail shoes because it’s not a fair fight. The Speedland SL:PDX is on a different level, a shoe made for those who spend all their free time running and hiking difficult trails.

Speedland SL:PDX

Release Date: August 15, 2021

Price: $375

Weight: 10.3oz (9.9oz with lugs cut)

Drop: 5mm (23mm forefoot, 28mm heel)

Pros

For the Speedland SL:PDX, customization is king. The Michelin outsole comes with 3mm cuttable lugs. You can leave the lugs long if your trails are muddy or cut them if your trails are dry and rocky. I tried the lugs both ways and enjoy them cut down. But if I was running through swamps? I’d leave the lugs long. It feels awesome to be able to customize your traction based on the conditions you run in.

Alongside the cuttable lugs, the outsole also offers two cuttable drainage holes. They come uncut but again, if your trails are wet, you’ll want the two small holes open so water can drain out easier.

Moving up the midsole…well, the midsole isn’t visible. It’s removable Pebax midsole housed inside the shoe. It’s similar to the setup of the Nike Air Zoom GT Cut or the Nike Kobe 9. Attached to the bottom of the midsole is a removable carbon fiber plate made by Carbitex. The carbon fiber plate does two things. One, it acts as a rock plate to protect the foot. And two, it works with the foam to provide a bit more bounce. While I didn’t feel much spring from the carbon plate, due to it being on the bottom and not embedded in the foam, I did appreciate the carbon plate on rocky trails. The SL:PDX felt nimbler without the plate but my feet felt the rocks. Adding the plate was necessary protection to avoid sore feet after rough trails. The Pebax midsole isn’t as plush as some other Pebax foams on the market but still feels good under foot. My guess is the rubber outsole caging the bottom of the midsole prevents it from expanding as much as it could. That’s probably necessary with a trail shoe as you don’t want to be too unstable, but the firmer initial feel may surprise people. The foam does break in nicely and is cushioned enough to protect your joints on long, grueling trails.

Another positive for the SL:PDX is the upper’s comfort and customizability. The dual BOA allows for quick tightening and loosening and is easy to use with gloves on cold days. I really liked being able to start a trail run with super tight shoes to help with stability. Then I loosened the shoes as my feet expanded 30-45 minutes into the run. Wide footers will also enjoy this setup because while the Speedland SL:PDX is wide footer friendly with an ample toe box, wide footers can leave the the forefoot loose while cranking down the rear BOA to achieve a one to one fit.

The upper materials themselves also helped the shoe fit well. The knit upper uses Dyneema (a super strong space age material) to add stability and durability while still maintaining the comfort of a typical knit build. Dyneema is expensive, so I doubt we’ll see it on a basketball shoe any time soon, but it would be the perfect improvement to most knit basketball sneakers. Finally, there’s a fantastic, large Achilles pillow to prevent heel blisters and add some plushness. The SL:PDX fits true to size and packs impressive comfort for a rough and tumble trail shoe.

Cons

My main complaint was that on trails that gain/lose elevation quickly, I couldn’t quite get the heel lockdown exactly where I wanted it. Since the BOA lacing system doesn’t wrap around the back of the foot, you don’t get pressed into the heel counter the way you do with more traditional lacing. This will likely not be true for everyone (depends on your foot) but on downhills I sometimes slid into the front edge of the shoe. This didn’t happen as much after my foot sunk into and left an impression in the midsole. The lockdown gets redemption as it improves with increased use.

The only other complaint is the material used on the straps. It’s a synthetic suede or felt type fabric most likely chosen for its durability and softness across the top of the foot. To me, it just doesn’t feel as premium as the rest of the shoe. Not sure what should replace it, but I see that as a place for Speedland to improve future models.

Speedland SL:PDX Summary

The Speedland SL:PDX is the best trail running shoe on the market. The SL:PDX grips the trail like a radial mountain bike tire, offers great support, protects the foot from rocks and roots, prioritizes durability, can speed up on race days and is easily customizable. It’s a serious trail runner’s dream shoe.

And if you’re someone who wants to run more trails but needs motivation? Having a pair of the Speedland SL:PDX in the closet amplifies the siren call of the trails and makes you want to wear it as often as possible.

adidas Harden Vol. 5 Review: Outdoor Breakdown & Comparison

We’re up to number five! Here’s my Harden Vol. 5 review – I’ll break down James Harden’s 5th signature basketball sneaker from adidas. While the designs might look unique and the variety in colorways is no short of fantastic, the general perception from others seems to be overwhelmingly bad so far.

Why’s that? Well, after about 4 months of outdoor play, let me give you some valuable insight into how the shoe performs after an extended period of time, directly compare it to the previous two Harden shoes I’ve played in, and also explain why some of the design choices just didn’t work for most people.

You’re here for a good one!

I. SPEC SHEET

click for a full-sized image

II. 1-MIN REVIEW 

For those in a hurry: it seems as the designers behind Harden’s 5th shoe tried to innovate and create a groundbreaking product.

However, for the general hooper on the blacktop or on a weary gym floor – the shoe was not a lot more than a failed experiment.

The Harden Vol. 5 fit me weird and even though they can fit a wide foot in there – you’ll likely end up with space length-wise. Regular/narrow footers should try these in-store or go down 1/2 a size.

Traction was acceptable on concrete but I was definitely slipping more than I expected on a softer rubber court outside. You WILL need to wipe the outsoles down. Frequently.

While the Boost + Lighstrike drop-in midsole sounds cool, the actual experience wasn’t. There’s some cushion to be felt underfoot, yes, but it’s quite dramatically limited by all the TPU caging all around it.

Security is the shoe’s strongest area since it’s built like a tank with TPU everywhere. Stability and foot containment are excellent but comes at a cost of discomfort, stiffness, bulkiness.

The shoe just felt HEAVY.

Pair all that with heel slippage and this became more of a chore than a shoe I enjoyed playing in. If you’re hunting for a good Harden hoop shoe – stick with the 3 or the 4.

III. FIT & COMFORT

Do they fit true to size or should you go up/down? How comfortable are they? Anything else to know fit-wise?

SIZING GUIDE

Let’s start with sizing. I’m sure some of you are familiar with adidas’s ultra-inconsistent sizing throughout not just basketball shoes but their athletic footwear in general. The 5th Harden model reminds us there’s no stopping the Three Stripes from playing with us.

The shoe runs long. Period. MOST of you should feel some extra room at the toebox if you go true to your usual size. Is that a bad thing? It depends. It also heavily depends on your foot shape as everyone’s is different. But based on the people’s feedback, expect some volume up at the front.

The tricky thing is, the shoe is near-perfect width-wise. So if you prefer a looser fit with some wiggle room – stick with your true size. If you want to ensure you’ll be getting a snug, near one-to-one experience, you definitely want to go down 1/2 a size like there’s no tomorrow.

Me being a prominent wide footer, I stuck with my true size.

I don’t fully appreciate the dead space at the front making the shoe feel like a boat loafer on-court. But I’m much better off actually being able to play in it for a longer period of time before needing to take ’em off since my feet are taking a beating from the suffocation width-wise.

So fellow wide footers, stick to your true size or skip the shoe entirely. I’m fairly okay with the way these fit me but it’s still far from perfect. There’s some annoying pressure at the lateral side for my pinky at times and don’t get me started on the stiff materials. More on that later.

Regular/narrow footers – I’d HIGHLY recommend trying these in store if you can. If you can’t yet, a half-size-down should be the safest option.

BE AWARE OF HEEL SLIPPAGE

And just like most people, I had annoying heel slippage that just refused to go away. While I’m pretty convinced it’s the curvature of the midsole and the fact that my heel simply can’t sit completely flat and at the very back of the shoe, the stiff material setup might’ve had a part in this as well.

Grabbing a pair of grippy socks and pulling down on your laces HARD will be required to keep the heel slippage to a tolerable level. I also encourage you to check out my heel slippage guide in case you’ll be grabbing a pair.

image source: adidas.com

COMFORT

Oh boy. There’s been a lot of talk about how uncomfortable these proved to be for a lot of people but knowing that I stayed patient and gave these plenty of time to hopefully break in and start feeling like a proper basketball shoe in 2022.

Well, it never did.

These were one of the longest 4 months of testing a shoe for me personally. As much as I wanted to like these, examine why some of the stuff feels like it does, and ultimately give these as big of a chance as I can, I just didn’t enjoy playing in these. Probably not for a single day.

Internally, these are fine on paper. The fabric around the ankle is the only portion that’s not backed with plastic and it’s stretchy, so putting the shoe on isn’t an issue. There are also plenty of properly sculpted achilles pillows that sat very comfortably against my achilles too.

And despite having extra room length-wise, they felt secure and sturdy due to the build. Mostly.

But the material choices and the way they’re implemented, the incredibly stiff midsole, the sheer weight of it all, and the oversaturation of, well, stuff on the shoe is just too much. It all feels like a distraction rather than an experience where you forget you’ve got a shoe on while banging it out on the blacktop.

Could I still continue playing in the shoe? Sure. I surely didn’t enjoy it but I could’ve still carried on and played the way I play in these. But if you’re constantly thinking about the shoes and how weird it all feels while trying to focus on the game or even while just shooting some hoops, something’s not right.

So, expect a secure shoe due to the overwhelming amount of structure throughout the build. But also expect the shoe to feel unusually heavy (bottom-heavy in particular), stiff and just, off.

You’d have to try these on for yourself to fully get what I mean but there’s a good chance you won’t. And for good reason. There are much better options comfort-wise out there.

IV. TRACTION

Does it grip various surfaces well? Is dust/debris a factor? How long will the outsoles last outdoors?

OUTDOOR PERFORMANCE

A similar traction pattern along with a very similar rubber compound to the previous Harden Vol. 4 is being utilized throughout the outsoles of the Vol. 5. I don’t know why the traction isn’t as good as on the 4th shoe but I felt the difference right away.

Even taking all the occasional slips on dirtier spots away, the base level of bite wasn’t as strong as it was on ALL of Harden’s other shoes in the line.

I did feel like this base level of grip was still enough for me to play confidently but sometimes, especially torsionally, I’d slide out or noticeably feel the delay on stops. I’ve heard the traction’s great on a pristine court but I don’t have such a luxury at the moment, so things were always chippy for me.

The overall experience was fairly decent but that’s mostly due to concrete or rubber being the primary options for me to play on, and those are much more abrasive surfaces. Multiple reviewers are reporting that these perform downright awful on dirty/dusty indoor courts, so be aware of that.

But all of this would’ve still been acceptable for the situation I’m in, don’t get me wrong there.

But when these outsoles are complete dust magnets that fail to push the dust out through the pattern, it’s almost game over. This wasn’t as noticeable on concrete for me but stepping into a synthetic rubber court, I’d get very mad if I skip a wipe or two.

So, prepare to frequently wipe the outsoles down to maintain acceptable traction and think twice about taking these on a weary court. Harden himself looks fine in these though, but that’s because he’s playing on a top-level, pristine NBA hardwood. For us regular guys, things can get tough with these.

If you’ll be getting these, I’d encourage regularly cleaning the outsoles before taking ’em to the court. Check out my guide on how to maintain good traction for additional tips.

OUTDOOR DURABILITY

Just like most adidas shoes, some really tacky rubber is being used here so while it will attract a lot of dust & debris in there, you can expect these to last a long time outdoors. 4 months in, no degraded performance, no additional issues, and the pattern is still all there.

If you can deal with the subpar traction to begin with, you should be good to go for multiple seasons in the Harden Vol. 5. Even on the blacktop.

V. CUSHION

How’s the impact protection? What about step comfort and energy return of the foam? Is it stable?

adidas introduced a drop-in midsole for the cushioning system for the first time in a basketball shoe and the Harden Vol. 5 sports a beefy setup. On paper.

The removable midsole packs Lightstrike as the carrier and a very conservative, thin layer of Boost in the middle portion, basically acting as an insole.

The idea sounds great, sure. But I just don’t get the reasoning behind this. The stuff that’s heavily marketed by adidas (which is the implementation of this cushion) is what literally keeps the ride from feeling how it should.

One, the midsole is a drop-in but it’s surrounded by a thick shell of plastic all around it. I just don’t think this is a good idea when you’ve got your two flagship cushions that are supposed to do what they do best: expand to absorb impact, spring back to return energy, and keep you comfortable.

But when you encase it in a heavy, tank-like TPU shell in a 360-degree fashion, that becomes the main thing you can feel while playing. Boost does need some form of caging since it is fairly unstable by itself, yes, but I really do think this is overkill and what hinders the shoe.

Two, Boost needs room to expand. This is a fact and it’s even been explained by adidas. Foam in general needs volume and enough space to properly compress to do its job.

The high sidewalls of the midsole definitely help with stability but again, it’s just too much in my opinion. It adds weight and prevents Boost from fully expanding.

Take a look at any shoe that has Boost. There’s a reason you always see it exposed at least in one or two areas of the midsole. While here, there’s not enough of it, to begin with, and stuffing it to a drop-in with thick walls results in severely limited compression potential.

And then there’s the carrier. If any of you have tried the shoe and can actually feel any form of Lightstrike here, let me know because I didn’t. Now, I do understand that this carrier is supposed to provide stability and rigidity for the midsole but then why market the shoe in such a way?

Boost + Lightstrike? So many people will and likely had believed in the hype and the actual experience turned to be much bleaker than what the tech specs show you.

While there’s a good amount of impact protection here because Boost is still Boost, I barely felt any of it. You can expect a little bit of compression if you’re heavier and possess some athleticism while riding fairly low to the ground.

But then again, I don’t even think it’s that good of a “low-profile” setup. It’s fast and firm, sure, so you won’t be feeling any delays upon contact with the ground but the plastic frame around the midsole kind of defeats the purpose. I wasn’t THAT low to the ground, nor was I riding elevated.

It’s just a bizarre setup that could’ve been great. Pure performance-wise, you’ll be getting some impact protection and you’ll definitely be stable due to the rigid midsole, its sidewalls, and the shoe’s flat platform.

But everything else that you’d normally want from a quality cushioning system: spring back, comfort, smooth step transitions, and Boost-like shock absorption? This is just not it. Perhaps it’s a setup that Harden particularly demanded. I’d definitely believe that if it’s true.

But the general audience that’s looking for a good cushion setup will likely end up disappointed here.

VI. SUPPORT

How much all-around security does it offer? What about the build’s stability and foot containment? Any restrictions in result?

One thing adidas doesn’t usually screw up is security. It all starts with a proper fit, so make sure you get the size right for this one first. Too much unwanted room can compromise the whole experience, no matter how many support components are stuffed inside.

For me though, even sticking with my true size and having a bit of extra length, I didn’t feel compromised. This is an extremely beefy setup that should hold anyone’s foot in and provide protection even if you’ve got the body of a LeBron James.

There’s a hard internal heel counter to lock in your ankle & heel, the (overdone) TPU sidewalls all around the midsole portion are also there to turn the shoe into a bulletproof vest for your foot. The removable midsole is amazingly rigid too AND it’s got a built-in midfoot shank.

Torsional support is insane here and probably even too much for some. I’d normally recommend such a build for a flat footer but in this case, I’m really not sure. You might end up even more uncomfortable rather than properly supported due to the build’s lack of ability to move well with one’s foot.

And then there’s the platform. It’s almost completely flat and on the wider side, so stability is unquestionably excellent here. Unfortunately though, at the cost of comfort, mobility, and a smooth heel-to-toe stride in this case.

But even despite all this STUFF on the shoe, my heel kept wanting to pop out. I drive it to the back of the shoe, re-lace it, play for some time before needing to repeat the process. Again and again.

What’s the point of all this support bulk when the design choices fail to keep your heel in place?

Looking past that though, no matter what kind of movement I threw at these, the overwhelming amount of structure to the upper catches anything at any time. These are absolute tanks, for the better or worse.

If for some reason you’re not experiencing any heel slippage with these, you’ll be strapped in for a very supportive ride. That’s for sure.

VII. THE BUILD

What are the materials used? How well do they perform on-court? How’s the quality & reliability of the build?

BUILD OVERVIEW

Don’t let the looks fool you. adidas calls this the Futurenatural upper but it’s just marketing shenanigans. I’m sure the design team had valid reasons behind this kind of build and I’d be eager to hear ’em all. Seriously.

Looks like there’s some kind of ripstop style fabric underneath but the whole build is wrapped in super hard plastic that’s not even a normal synthetic you’d see on today’s shoes. It’s literal plastic that’s hard to the touch, it’s scratchy and it’s heavy.

The only parts that feature fully exposed fabric with no backings are the tongue and the ankle collar. There are also these felt overlays all throughout the upper that made for some really dope designs, I’ll give ’em that. They do nothing for performance though.

The whole build is actually a one-piece design, which means the midsole and the upper portions are molded together. This has been done before but here, I don’t really see a clear benefit honestly. Take a look at the lebron 19 – that’s where this type of design really shines.

But let’s not get all cynical here. Like most things in life, even such a build will have its strong suits.

PERFORMANCE & RELIABILITY

This is definitely a durable setup that should last you a LONG time, so it could be considered a good bang for your buck. Especially if you’re an outdoor hooper.

The crazy amount of structure also means support & containment are no short of stellar. Linearly, laterally, torsionally, diagonally, whatever. Your foot’s not going anywhere when there’s so much plastic all around it.

But the negatives are what make this shoe unattractive for most people. I usually don’t judge a shoe by its weight as it’s just a number. But 18+ ounces? There are heavier shoes that don’t feel heavy because they fit really well, the build moves well with your foot and each component works in-hand with each other well.

While on the Harden Vol. 5, it just doesn’t. I could clearly feel the midsole portion weighing the whole shoe down which is not something I feel often in a basketball sneaker. And then there’s the lack of flexibility, stiffness, feeling clunky and all the synonyms you could find.

You can forget about ventilation too.

All in all, the overall experience on the court was subpar. The shoe felt heavy, a little bulky, and often stiff upon a movement where other shoes would normally move along with my foot. It’s playable, sure. But what’s the point when there are much better options out there?

VIII. OVERALL

Rounding the Harden Vol. 5 review up: are they versatile? Who’s best suited for the shoe? Is it a good deal?

The adidas Harden Vol. 5 is the first sneaker in Harden’s main lineup that failed to impress me. I was more confused rather than let down as some of the design choices really seemed to have reasoning behind ’em. But actually playing on the court is much different from an idea on paper.

Perhaps The Beard himself prefers it this way. And we can’t blame him – he’s an elite athlete, while we’re just hoopers. But after the Harden Vol. 3 and the kyrie 8 which were both phenomenal, I’m just confused.

The shoe has its strong suits. Despite fitting long, most people will be fine stepping down half a size, while wide footers should get away with their true size. Traction’s acceptable AS LONG as you’re on a clean court or you’re wiping the outsoles down frequently.

This crazy build is also durable and undeniably supportive. Even the heaviest and highest-jumping dudes should find enough structure for protection.

Nike Precision 5 Review: Detailed 2-Month OUTDOOR Breakdown

Despite lots of pricing inconsistencies, overhyped releases that turned out as something left-to-be-desired, and generally deceiving marketing – I simply cannot deny Nikey makes a TON of shoes each year and some of those are actually super solid options for almost dirt cheap. Hence I present my Nike Precision 5 review.

Fitting right into the mentioned affordable range that still produces a solid product, I’ll break down the 5th shoe in the Swoosh’s Precision line. I’ll analyze its fit & comfort, performance, general value for the money, versatility, and whether it’s a worthy upgrade over last year’s already pretty good Precision 4.

I. SPEC SHEET

click for a full-sized image

II. 1-MIN REVIEW 

For those in a hurry: the Nike Precision 5 is a near-identical model to last year’s shoe, albeit with a few small changes.

Most players should go true to size with these, including wide footers. Traction was just as good as the Precision 4’s but this time, the shoe took a step down in terms of durability – the rubber used was noticeably weaker.

The basic foam midsole cushion is nothing to boast about but fans an ultra-fast, reponsive, low-to-the-ground ride will absolutely love the setup.

I had no issues with support despite the super minimal build.

The super minimalistic textile build is on the cheaper side of things but still worked on-court. No containment issues even for a more explosive player like myself.

The few gripes I’ve had with the shoe is the laces loosening up very quickly after I lace ’em up, the tongues often get bunched up and causing some minimal discomfort and the foam sidewalls aren’t peachy for a wide foot.

It’s acceptable though.

For alternatives, check out the Precision 4 if you want the same shoe but better durability for outdoors and the Zoom Freak 2 for an upgraded, beefed up (but still fast & mobile) low-top.

The full review is below

III. FIT & COMFORT

Do they fit true to size or should you go up/down? How comfortable are they? Anything else to know for the wearer?

image source: nike.com

SIZING GUIDE

Starting off with the need-to-know, the Precision 5 fit me true to size, despite me being a huge wide footer. Yes, I’m one of the boat-foot/clown-foot type individuals. However, the Precision 5 wasn’t among the shoes that brought a slew of issues for me.

Regular footers or those with more narrow-shaped feet should also opt for their usual size. Most guys should expect a snug, near one-to-one fit with these. Give ’em time and everything should normalize for just about anyone unless you’ve got even wider/thicker feet than I do. In that case, I wish you the best of luck my friend.

My initial experience started off really snug but it kinda always does. For a more forgiving build such as this one, I was able to achieve passable comfort in around a month.

I was able to play and shoot around from day 1 of course but I definitely didn’t feel optimal since the upper felt tight, and the two little foam pieces that come up on both sides of the midfoot applied some pressure.

Not the worst-case scenario though, and by far. Every few days of action felt better and better, and around a month’s time was enough to minimize the annoying foam pieces colliding with my foot’s bones and stretch out the material to its limit.

Can I still feel the presence of tightness? Yes, occasionally. Those little foam sidewalls still tend to hit the bone of my foot during certain quicker moves and that’s still uncomfortable but by far not as bad as it initially started off.

I’d bet my money that you wouldn’t even have this issue, to begin with, if you’ve got a foot that’s even slightly more narrow than mine.

 vs. the Precision 4: the 5th shoe is definitely a bit roomier width-wise since it’s finally not the same recycled build. I needed to go up half a size with the previous model and even then things weren’t optimal and took time to break in.

While the Precision 5 isn’t an ideal shoe for a wide footer either, I’d still choose it over the 4th just because of the extra room at the toebox.

image source: nike.com

COMFORT

While we can’t expect a god-sent shoe that feels like a dose of luxury with a $70 price tag, I still have to give credit where it’s due.

The Precision 5 feels like a fast and light formula. They can’t offer you a luxury knit or flagship tech but the materials actually wrapped around my foot fairly well compared to the usual budget builds consisting of cheap synthetics.

Oh, and they’re SUPER light. I mean feather-like.

There’s a tad bit of padding around the ankle and on the tongue – pretty much in line with the rest of Nikey’s affordable lineup of hoop shoes. The tongue isn’t your insanely sharp LeBron 19 like absurdity – so no worries there. Your shins are safe!

The shoe is also a treat to put on, even for a massive foot like mine.

The only little gripe I have in the fit/comfort department is that the tongue tends to get all bunched up sometimes. Skip cranking down of the top laces and you’ll be running around with a pair of flappers on top. Doesn’t affect performance in a meaningful way but still thought I’d mention it.

vs. the Precision 4: very similar comfort-wise. Both shoes feel light & fast and I tend to forget I’ve got them on while playing which is a great feeling to have on the court.

Numbers-wise, the Precision 5 is even lighter (by a small margin) and the altered build introduces a little bit of extra structure so it’s a win-win for the latest release.

IV. TRACTION

Does it grip a variety of surfaces well? Is floor dust/debris a factor? How long will they last outdoors?

image source: nike.com

TRACTION PERFORMANCE

Just like the main build, the outsoles were changed up from the last shoe as well. A herringbone-like pattern on the lateral portion and a denser, more compact pattern medially. Solid rubber is used for all colorways – no translucent options are available.

While these don’t squeak as much as some other Nike kicks, I have NO COMPLAINTS about the traction. They truly did deliver in covering me no matter the movement, the angle, how fast I stopped, or where I stepped.

I’ve played outdoors on a classic blacktop and also on a rubber surface. The traction was deadly on both. These actually remind me of the Curry 8 in terms of the sheer bite which is insane. Check out my review of the Curry 8 and you’ll see why.

Now, most shoes do just fine on an abrasive concrete surface since there’s plenty of friction from the ground. Well, my rubber court I usually go to is all kinds of dirty and some of the rubber is torn off, leaving more slippery spots. I’d often feel I stepped on one of these areas with a lot of shoes.

Not with the Precision 5.

While I still recommend wiping down the outsoles every few plays/minutes just to be sure – you shouldn’t have issues even if you don’t have such a habit.

I haven’t personally played indoors yet (hopefully VERY soon) but have seen multiple reviewers reporting that they don’t have issues on hardwood either, but occasional wiping is encouraged.

image source: nike.com

OUTDOOR DURABILITY

The bite’s great. But how’s the outsole holding up, you say? I’m afraid things aren’t as peachy this time but don’t get overly worried either.

As you might’ve guessed, the lateral portions of the outsole that utilize a herringbone-style pattern are clearly holding up better than the thin, dense stuff that’s slapped on the medial portions.

I don’t really get the reasoning behind this since they could’ve just used the herringbone variation throughout the whole thing and called it a day. This is Nikey though, a 35 billion-dollar company we’re talking about. We’re never gonna know everything.

So, while I can’t feel a degrade in the shoe’s bite yet, I expect it nonetheless since the medial portions are quickly burning off. And I mean quickly.

I’m convinced that I’ll get through a full season of outdoor play with these. I’m NOT convinced I’ll get through multiple though, and that these will grip just as well indoors after all that rubber getting destroyed in the park.

There’s my longevity hypothesis for ya.

vs. the Precision 4: I found the base level of traction deadlier and sharper in the 5th shoe but if I had to choose between the two for someone who’s looking to play outdoors for a long time and not break the bank – the Precision 4 definitely has more durable rubber for the same price.

Also check out my shoe list for outdoors if you’re looking for a reliable option.

V. CUSHION

How’s the impact protection? What about step comfort and energy return of the foam? Is it stable?

While a lot of components have been changed up from the last model, the cushion’s not one of them. The Precision line never really had bad cushion – it’s just not for everyone.

The Precision 5 utilizes what Nike calls a “resilient foam midsole” but if you follow Nikey, you know there can’t be anything else but Phylon in there. And yes, Phylon’s definitely resilient – the midsole will feel as it should for a loooong time.

However, Phylon by itself is also pretty stubborn, so you won’t get a lot of compression with these.  I could feel the heel portion of the foam just a tiny bit if I do a harder plant or a heel strike. The forefoot portion is all about responsiveness and speed. Don’t expect bounce over there.

So, the setup is right around the “budget” range – minimal impact protection, very responsive, and low to the ground. Fantastic for low-profile players or for those that are lighter or just don’t prefer having tons of cushion underfoot.

For a more athletic player, a classic big man, or for someone who’s heavier – this might not be your cup of tea. I’m nowhere near to being heavy for my height and I still could barely feel the cushion.

However, there’s just enough to keep things comfortable and avoid the feeling of literal bricks under your feet – something from the repertoire of a Kyrie 2 or a Mamba Instinct. This is still not a perfect option for those long, multiple-hour pickup sessions on concrete.

Heavy or not, your feet will feel fatigued in such situations. I personally started feeling some foot fatigue and slight pain in the balls of my feet after about 2 weeks of testing these. Doesn’t start that way but play for 3+ hours for a few weeks straight and you’ll see what I mean.

So basically, the Swoosh saved the most cash by shoving a basic Phylon midsole for the Precision 5. If you don’t need a lot of cushion – you’ll be just fine. If you need more cushion – you might want to save a bit more $$$ and check out these options.

 vs. the Precision 4: right around the same. Just a tad bit of actual feedback from the foam while staying fast & low to the ground. I did find the step transitions of the Precision 5 to be a bit smoother but not by a large margin. Both offer minimal cushion setups.

VI. SUPPORT

How much all-around security does it offer? What about the build’s stability and foot containment? Any restrictions in result?

Security is where the latest shoe in the lineup introduced some slight tweaks while keeping the overall experience feeling the same for the wearer. I definitely like that.

The 5th shoe in the Precision line features a solid internal heel counter to lock your ankle & heel in the back of the shoe, foam sidewalls that come up on several areas of the upper, acting as additional protection.

The platform of the shoe is on the wider side and we’ve also got a pair of aggressive outriggers to catch those ankle rolls. The lacing system is traditional and flat laces are used now, which I found to perform and hold the tightness better than your standard cheap, slippery laces you see on budget models.

Torsional rigidity has been beefed up as well – although there’s still no midfoot shank in place, the midsole itself and the rubber caging around it made the shoe rigid enough to feel safe. Never once I thought something’s off there.

I still wouldn’t recommend these to a flat footer just because of the lack of proper cushion. Check out this shoe list if you happen to be one.

I definitely like the end product in terms of support though. No containment issues, no confidence issues while making a move, none of that. While it’s still a fairly minimal shoe and there are beefier options out there, I’m certain most guys will find these enough since most of us don’t have the attributes of a LeBron.

vs. the Precision 4: still light, still comfortable but a bit more supportive this time! While a small one, it’s still an upgrade without sacrificing any other qualities.

VII. THE BUILD

What are the materials used? How well do they perform on-court? How’s the quality & reliability of the setup?

THE BUILD

The shoe features a textile material at the toebox, while a more tightly wrapped fabric & a synthetic overlay at the back. There are also some cheap Fuse overlays on high-wear areas such as the toe and around the eyelets.

The tongue is mesh-backed with some foam and the shoe sports a traditional lace & tongue construction. No one-bootie stuff here.

One thing that’s pretty cool is that all overlays on top of the textile are put together with no sews, and Nikey claims that improves durability. We’ll see how’s that glue holding up in a few more months Nike. We’ll see.

PERFORMANCE

The setup is basic but as long as the shoe fits my foot properly and the material isn’t some plastic that bangs up my foot – I’ll be just fine. This textile wrapped around my forefoot nicely, and never once did I think I’m playing in a “cheap” shoe on the court.

The back portion also felt great but that one’s tough to screw up. The minimal padding around the ankle & tongue could’ve been beefier but that didn’t take away from the shoe. Ventilation also isn’t the best despite the materials being fairly thin.

But if we’re talking pure performance – I really do not have any serious complaints. The textile moved well with my foot and held it in place.

The only downsides to the build are a few already-mentioned nitpicks: the tongue getting bunched up, laces loosening up occasionally, the foam pieces colliding with my wide feet initially, and iffy ventilation.

None of those make the shoe a bad one, to be clear. But still something to remember before buying.

Here’s the midfoot portion for the black colorway.

DURABILITY

The second-to-last pair of eyelets are getting pretty banged up 2 months in, there are also a few frays in the toebox, and the ankle collar’s getting a bit trashed from me constantly putting the shoe on, and off. That’s about it for the damage so far.

None of the wear & tear screams ALERT to me yet but who knows how these will look half a year in. We’ll see. So far though, things are looking somewhere in the line with a 90-100 dollar shoe which is great but this type of comparison is getting less and less relevant these days due to the market getting inconsistent.

We don’t know why some things are priced how they are anymore, so don’t get shocked if an $80 sneaker outlasts a $150 “signature”.

vs. the Precision 4: I could say the 5th shoe technically offers a “better” material setup since this textile feels a bit beefier than last year’s paper thin knit. And I don’t remember the 4th shoe hugging my foot as well.

Still though, the differences are marginal when you take things to the court. Both are basic setups, so expect moderate durability and likely some foul-ups in quality control since this is the price range where most of it happens. Or should happen. Like I said, you never know anymore.

VIII. OVERALL

Rounding things up: are they versatile? Who’s best suited for the shoe? Is it a good deal amongst the competition?

The Nike Precision 5 is another trusty bang-for-your-buck option from the gods of the Swoosh. Once again, not a crazy shoe – it won’t impress your fellow sneakerheads, nor will it blow you away on the court.

While we get a ton of weird stuff from Nike these days, I have to appreciate something as the Precision lineup, offering a good shoe for a fraction of the price of their flagships.

If you’re looking for a solid option RIGHT NOW, and can’t afford to spend $100+ on a single pair – this is truly a potential pick for ya. As long as you can live without good cushioning underfoot.

QUICK RECAP

The Precision 5 should fit most guys true to their size, including wide footers like myself. Traction is deadlier than ever, though be aware that the pattern is rapidly getting wrecked 2 months in and it’s not going to get better from there.

Cushion is something that could be considered as lacking but if you can live with a low-profile setup – this will do the trick. Support is actually great and an upgrade over the last shoe, and while the material choices might look cheap – the shoe plays just fine.

If I’d be playing outdoors sometimes, I’d definitely pick the Precision 5 over last year’s sneaker. However, since I’m still playing in the park every time I hoop, I’d have to lean towards the 4th shoe as much I don’t like saying that. It simply has a better pair of outsoles slapped on that use thicker, tackier rubber.

This one’s up to you to decide – I don’t know your particular situation and/or needs on the basketball court. But I hope that by now you can weigh each shoe’s pros & cons and make the decision!